The Great Debate: Is Value Investing Dead? (A Reddit Analysis)

The question "Is value investing dead?" is a perennial topic of heated debate on finance subreddits like r/ValueInvesting and r/investing. For the past decade, growth stocks have dramatically outperformed traditional value stocks, leading many to question if the classic principles of Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett are still relevant. This article dives into the arguments on both sides of the Reddit debate to understand the case for and against value investing in the 21st century.

What is Traditional Value Investing?

Classic value investing, pioneered by Benjamin Graham, is the art of buying stocks for less than their intrinsic value. It involves analyzing a company's financial statements to find businesses that are trading at a discount to their tangible assets. These are often solid, profitable, but "boring" companies in established industries with low price-to-earnings (P/E) or low price-to-book (P/B) ratios. The strategy is to buy these undervalued companies and wait for the market to recognize their true worth, a concept Graham called "margin of safety."

The Reddit Debate: A Tale of Two Philosophies

The debate on Reddit is a nuanced discussion about whether the original formula still works or if the philosophy needs to adapt to the modern economy.

The Case That "Value is Dead"

Proponents of this view argue that structural changes in the economy have made traditional value metrics obsolete.

The Rise of Intangible Assets: Classic value investing focuses on tangible assets (factories, inventory). But today, the most valuable assets are often intangible—brand value (Apple), network effects (Meta), and software code (Microsoft). These don't show up on a balance sheet, making price-to-book ratios misleading.
"Growth is Part of Value": Redditors often quote Charlie Munger, arguing that the old distinction between "value" and "growth" is a false dichotomy. A fast-growing company can be a "value" investment if its future earnings power is not fully reflected in its current stock price.
The Efficiency of Information: In Graham's day, you could find bargains by digging through reports. Today, with instant access to data, simple, obvious bargains are much harder to find.

The Case That "Value is Just Evolving"

Defenders of value investing argue that its principles are timeless and that its recent underperformance is cyclical, not permanent.

Human Psychology is Unchanged: The market is still driven by fear and greed. Mr. Market, Graham's famous allegory, still offers irrational prices during panics, creating value opportunities.
Value is a Broad Church: They argue that "value" doesn't just mean low P/E. It means buying anything for less than it's worth, including high-quality companies with strong competitive advantages (moats) that can be bought at a fair price. This is what Buffett practices today.
Reversion to the Mean: Historically, there have been long periods where growth has outperformed value, and vice versa. Value investors believe the extreme outperformance of growth stocks is a bubble and that a "reversion to the mean" is inevitable.

🧠 "People who say value investing is dead are just looking at the wrong metrics. They think it's just about buying cigar butts with one last puff. That was Graham. Buffett evolved to buying wonderful companies at a fair price. The principles are the same: know what a business is worth and don't overpay for it."
- A common sentiment on r/ValueInvesting

The Synthesis: The Modern Definition of Value Investing

The consensus on Reddit is that "cigar-butt" value investing—buying statistically cheap but often terrible businesses—is indeed dead or at least very difficult. The market is too efficient for such a simple strategy to work consistently.

However, the fundamental philosophy is very much alive. The modern value investor, as championed by the community on Reddit, combines the quantitative analysis of Graham with the qualitative insights of investors like Philip Fisher and Charlie Munger. The new formula for value looks like this:

Find a Wonderful Business: A company with a durable competitive advantage ("moat"), strong management, and good long-term growth prospects.
Determine Its Intrinsic Value: Analyze its future cash flows to determine what the business is truly worth.
Buy it at a Fair Price: Wait for a market downturn or a temporary setback to create a "margin of safety"—an opportunity to buy this wonderful business at a reasonable price.

Conclusion: The Timeless Philosophy Endures

The Reddit debate makes it clear: value investing is not dead, but it has adapted to a changing world. The simplistic approach of just buying stocks with low P/E ratios has been replaced by a more holistic approach that focuses on business quality as much as price. The timeless principles of knowing what you own, having a margin of safety, and viewing a stock as a piece of a business are more relevant than ever. The tools and metrics may have changed, but the core philosophy of value investing remains a powerful strategy for long-term wealth creation.

Community Discussion

Have questions or insights about this guide? Join the conversation below using your GitHub account.